Egyptian Mau Breed Council
|
Egyptian Mau Breed Council Breed Council Meeting Saturday June 17, 2006 10AM Cascade II Hilton Reno, NV
Members in attendance Jill Archibald Karen Bishop Dot Brocksom Constance Carroll Laurie Coughlan Michael Michaels Melanie Morgan Patricia Summers
Old Business
§ NE Dot Brocksom § W Hilary Nelson § Mid-Atlantic Patricia Summers § NE Jill Archibald § MW Michael Michaels
§ Objective of the program to provide communication to and from BC to Judges. Method for sharing Breed Standard specific items with judges and exhibitors § Coordinator is Breeds and Standards Chair who communicates with the Breed Council Secretary who receives input from Breed Council members § Draft of specific procedures is in progress and will be published soon, but until then the informal procedure remains that all issues from breeders should be forwarded to BCS who will forward to B&S Chair. B& S Chair then forwards to judges lists. Any responses will be forwarded to BCS who will report back to BC members. § Concerns about fact that feedback in response from the judges has not been provided brought up. Procedures should work both ways § Lengthy discussion from various BCS about unauthorized contact or confusing posts that cause confusion among judging community. B&S stressed fact that communication should be funneled through and screened by BCS § Discussion about using the procedure with discretion every contact has both intended and unintended repercussions
|
§ Smokes a waste of time
§ Smokes dilutes??? unworthy as a color
§ Judging all in one color class
§ Mis-identifying the breed
§ Egyptian Mau is a brown desert cat
![]() | Need to educate when appropriate, but do no initiate discussion unless warranted and there is an opening after the final. Best to not make a big deal about it. Wait for the opportunity and make yourself available. If judge asks, then respond |
![]() | If there is a problem that concerns you, one avenue is to contact BCS and let them address it through Breeds and Standards |
![]() | Request made for official form for chain of communication will bring it up with Breeds and Standards at next meeting, but in the meantime, the chain of communication is via the written contact |
![]() | Use with discretion but remember, there are intended consequences and unintended and we need to be careful to not cause unexpected problems |
![]() | Designed to identify common colors among all breeds. Project underway. When complete all common colors will be referenced at front of standards rather than in each individual standard. Cheryl Coleman coordinating, Melanie Morgan assisting |
![]() | Some want permanent outcross need for rationale stressed |
![]() | Joan Miller discussed that times have changed. In past, outcrosses were only options for expanding genepool, now we have Internatioinal connections as well as other registries |
![]() | Kitty Angell discussed that we often concentrate on the positives of outcrosses, but there are also often negative and that all outcross opportunities carry potential risk that must be addressed with care. |
![]() | Definition of HHP discussed at length |
![]() | Paul Patton asked why registration policies were not available. B&S chair promised to look into the issue and forward to BCS Will forward when they are available |
![]() | Frequency use common sense. Every time a change is passed, 100+ judges need to assimilate new information |
![]() | Alternate years for LH/SH discussed |
![]() | Intended and untended effects discussed and the need to be extremely careful |
![]() | Need to clarify what AOV means in each breed |
§ Different objectives for each breed
· Advancement to Championship status
· Tracking
· Info/education for judges (straight eared folds)
§ Melanie Morgan to head committee to compile specific breed definitions
§ Egyptian Mau AOV
· Originally the smoke introduced as AOV with goal of introducing for advancement
· Black implemented so that they could be used in breeding programs
· Dilute versions introduced for tracking purposes only
· Question asked if the intention was to eliminate the dilutes from genepool answer that it was breeder discretion, but that we all need to be careful about limiting our already small genepool
![]() | Essence of a Breed
|
§ Joan Miller to forward draft to BCS
§ BCS to put together overall vision/description
§ Will forward draft from Joan for brainstorming once available
![]() | Mentorship program
| ||||
![]() | Breeder Referral List CFA
|
§ Qualifications show 2 times, Breed Council members no Board support at this time
§ Discussed procedures for dealing with frequent complaints. There is a method for filing protests for complaints from public who have contacted people supplied by CFA
§ Discussion regarding the only thing we can do is to be very careful about where and how we sell our cats
![]() | Breeder Assistance Program
|
Import policy
![]() | Passed in diluted version which was dictated by Central office |
![]() | Board members assure us that if we want to modify for the future, that they will be receptive |
![]() | Good start well received |
![]() | Guidelines actually designed from the original proposal and specified by the BCS. Designed to clarify process. |
![]() | Concern about taking out the generational requirements, and the requirement that the cat should be picked up in person by importer |
Egyptian Mau Rescue
![]() | Concerns over EMRO program discussed |
![]() | Article has had some significant impact |
![]() | Not an Egyptian Mau rescue group should be promoted as an Egyptian Cat Rescue group which is very different |
![]() | Many people who are not Breed Council members and who do not have a sufficient knowledge base are the ones who are integrating cats not properly screened |
Next meeting: San Mateo November 2006
Adjourn for awards presentations from GEMS, EMBFC
|